Source Logic

An illustration · invented records · the research is real and cited

An illustration · invented records · this source is real

Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population

Sgroi DC, Sestak I, Cuzick J, Zhang Y, et al. (2013). Lancet Oncology. PubMed 24035531 · DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70387-5 · PubMed record

What kind of source: Comparison of three tests on archived trial tissue (TransATAC), postmenopausal women. Where it sits in the summary: Not yet known. Back to the summary

What it says, in plain language

In postmenopausal women, the 21-gene score predicted recurrence in the first five years but not later recurrence (years five to ten). Another test did. This marks a limit of what the score can say about the long term.

Source access: this note uses the published abstract, linked above. The full article was not available for this review and is not included in the folder.

The exact words we relied on

“however, only BCI-L was significant for late distant recurrence” — PMID:24035531, Abstract, Findings

How these quotes were checked

Follow the passage links above to the included paper or public source record.

Abstract only. The quotes above come from the paper’s published abstract as held in the PubMed record. They were checked by exact string match against the PubMed record cached on 2026-09-08. This note is limited to the abstract; the full article was not read.

Limits of this source

Archived tissue from one trial; a comparison of prognostic tests, not of treatments. A published correction (PubMed 29611522, Lancet Oncol 2018;19(4):e184, read 2026-09-10) narrows the confidence-interval lines in figure 3 and two appendix graphs, which had been calculated with an incorrect method; the risk curves and the reported findings were not changed. Abstract only.

Review

Reviewed by Sarah Kiselycznyk · September 10, 2026. Review scope and verification method: How we researched this.

Summary · Question and scope · Home